What I like about this idea is the scale of it. It appears most of the projects are small scale residential and commercial projects. Essentially, the clients who always tend to hire the contractor before the architect... These are also perfect size projects for Revit to really excel... I think the video and description below explain it well. Also, it is totally free for designers to sign up!
Welcome to arcbazar.com!
We created the first-of-its-kind online competition webpage for small to medium scale design projects to allow an easy and fast connection interface between clients, young architectural designers and contractors. We developed the idea for arcbazar.com after realizing that all too often clients could not find an easy and affordable way to find competitive architectural design services. At the same time, designers have a hard time to connect to clients and use their design talent. Therefore, we set out to create a simple, easy-to-use platform that serves and connects the triumvirate of clients, designers and contractors.
Founded in 2010, arcbazar.com is owned and operated by a dedicated executive team and web-developers. Our aim is to help our peers, young designers and architects finding exciting design opportunities from design conscious individuals. Our name arcbazar, is inspired by the idea of a bazaar for architecture – a vibrant space for exchange and negotiation of design services. We are based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and are working around the clock as we prepare the matching of designers with the exciting projects of our clients.
We are eager to answer your questions about arcbazar.com, so feel free to contact us via

FairFees4all · 696 weeks ago
In Arcbazar's FAQ's, they suggest a "client" set a 2% fee of total construction costs for prize money, 60% of which is awarded to the winning designer = 1.2% fee. For 1.2% fee, the designer submits DD level docs to be handed to a contractor for construction.
So, for example, on a $40,000 job a designer gets 60% of $800 = $480 total.
In my experience doing custom residential to DD level = about 40% of total fee using hand or Autocad. With Revit it's more like 50% or more because more time is required upfront in earlier design phases.
What this means is that for a $40,000 job, the "designer" is getting paid close to the minimum wage. Not a good deal for the designer - or the client for that matter...you get what you pay for.
Then there are liability, and copyright issues. Who does the as-builts for a remodeling prior to design, are they in digital form?....I could go on and on....
Bottom line, bad, bad idea for the profession of architecture.
TheRevitKid 72p · 696 weeks ago
I am sorry the post disappointed you. But hey, 1 out of 701 posts is not a bad ratio ;) I hope you continue to follow the blog regardless.
TheRevitKid 72p · 696 weeks ago
FairFee4all · 696 weeks ago
If a client wants less than full service - say just through SD - we can break that out knowing from past billing history that phases break down as a percent of the total full service fee based on % of total construction cost as follows:
PD/SD = 20% of full service fee
DD = 20% " ".
CD = 40%
Bidding and CA = 20%
Add those up it = 10-15% of total construction costs.
Revit changes those % per phase with more upfront work saving time in CD's.
Hourly rates for someone trying to make a living vary from $60 for the avg. Joe to $150+ for a high profile firm. Keep in mind taxes, insurance, rent, and all the other expenses that go into running a business and $60/hr = 45K per year. Not much considering the cost of an arch degree!
TheRevitKid 72p · 696 weeks ago
I understand your feelings about the fee structure and how it effects the industry. It is bad enough the fees keep getting lower and lower. On the other hand, if you look at the scale of the projects on the Arcbazar site they are very small. They are probably the projects that people would never pay 10% to the architect on top of the construction cost and contractors fees... So, in reality, either the builder will simply build it with some crap drawings and his "imagination" or the builder will call a starving designer who will but a set of drawings together for next to noting anyway....
I think the issue that arises is the societal loss of value of what an architect does... That is what we really need to get back.
Would Arcbazat help or hurt the issue??
FairFee4all · 696 weeks ago
So who benefits? Who loses? Who are these people at Arcbazar and what motivates them?
How can this discussion get to a broader audience?
TheRevitKid 72p · 696 weeks ago
I also think you should email the team at Arcbazar as well. I will be seeing my professor on Tuesday and I can discuss it with him as well.
I am sure your concerns are the same as many.
Danny · 696 weeks ago
Mark · 695 weeks ago